Meeting with Consultants to Discuss Lake Options

Care Group met this week with Council and Tony Weber of Alluvium Consulting to discuss the feasibility study of lake Management Options. Alluvium Consulting where engaged to provide Council with the expertise to review and assess all options.

Care group highlighted the urgency to get action. This was based on the increasing severity of algal blooms over the last 4 years and the declining lake health.

Both Council and Tony agreed on the urgency.

The Care Group suggested to fast track the Griffith recommendation of sand capping/Phoslock but GCCC made it clear that consideration of all options needs to be assessed first.

Feasibility of options including one – way valve, phoslock with or without sand capping and aquatic planting /vegetation etc will be ranked according to the Multi Criteria assessment. An estimated time frame of Mid February was given for the submission of Alluvium’s report to Council.

Council advised they are working towards implementation of at least one of the options that has the potential to make a measurable difference before next summer.

The Care group will be following up on progress on long overdue action over the coming months.

Long List of Problems Highlight Neglect of Merrimac High Sailing Shed Area

Councillor Young has received a long list of problems from council officers relating to the sailing shed and is awaiting awaiting a building and engineers inspection and report on the current condition.

The Care Group have advised that:

  1. The reality is that no maintenance is largely responsible for these problems.
  2. It would cost much more to remove the shed than to fix the issues below. To get access for the heavy demolition equipment and removal of concrete etc would damage the park works just completed as this is the only access.
  3. You would still have the costs of landscaping. If these costs were spent on the existing shed most of the problems would be resolved.

Below is the list of issues and care group response;

  • Unsafe due to location and design; does not comply with Crime Prevention Through Environmental design (CPTED) principles. That is the design & location creates hidden areas obscured from passive surveillance and lends itself to potential criminal behavior – The same could be said behind any toilet block in any park- numerous residents overlook the entrance so it is not hidden and taming the “Jungle” on either side can improve visibility.

•Balustrade is non-complaint to current building standards – How long has this been non-compliant? Why has this not been previously rectified if non-compliant?

•The landscaping has failed on top of the building and on the steep surrounds – requiring considerable landscape amendments and new surface treatment options – No maintenance! – as suggested removal of soil from roof, screening plants around exposed concrete area which will help with soil stabilization.

•Retaining walls require extension to improve and contain steep slope and landscaping – Not if some soil removed and screening/stabilising plants installed.

•Existing landscape trees have outgrown the environment and damaging associated infrastructure – This is the cost of lack of maintenance.

•Worn areas in front of roller door requires concrete slab work – Grass in this area is in better condition than the adjacent park area, is concreting necessary?

•Access path has failed and is not DDA compliant – extremely difficult to remove existing path and replace with DDA compliant path – The barrier that has recently failed, provided the necessary compliance to prevent falling into the lake. Is path replacement even required if barrier is maintained?

•Security gate in front of roller door requires replacement/repairs – Ongoing maintenance.

•Unknown structural integrity & potential for improvements – The works required are long overdue maintenance, not improvements.

•Expected considerable costs to undertake above improvement works: assess sustainability for the greater community and appropriate use of rate payers money. – removal far more expensive and park landscaping works still required.

•Given the water quality issues the equipment has not been used for several months and is not permitted within the lake during poor quality water events – Sailing is classed as a secondary contact water sport and can be carried out safely even with elevated algae levels.

•Therefore is the Merrimac school better suited to use an alternative location for water craft / sailing activities. – LHM is the ONLY location on the GC that can provide a Shark free safe environment for sailing and the close proximity to the school is a major reason this lake is used given the limited time frame for school sports.

La Niña Prediction Could Spell Disaster for Lake.

The Bureau of Meteorology has declared a La Niña indicating a wet summer with increased chances of flooding and cyclones.

Flushing of LHM should be beneficial but as experienced in January, nutrients washed down from parks and properties as well as high levels of nutrients from the canal after the heavy rainfall assisted in achieving record levels of algae and severe degradation of water quality.

It is important to take steps NOW to minimise runoff from properties by insuring lawns, garden beds etc are kept in good order ready for possible heavy rain.

The Care Group will be meeting with parks this week to highlight the problem areas and will be discussing what can be done in the short and long term to reduce runoff of lawn clippings etc into the lake.

Triathlon Users Highlight the Importance of LHM

Regular lake users highlight the importance of Lake Hugh Muntz for Triathlon training. Some have been training here for over 26 years and have seen the lake quality deteriorate to the current state of continual closures. Despite the health risk, many are forced to train through lake closures due to the lack of suitable training locations.

Despite 20 years of declining water quality, users are still waiting for a plan from Council to address water quality issues to ensure the continued use of this valuable community asset.

Request on Timeframes For Implementation of Griffith Recommendations

In the recent meeting with Council it was announced that a private consulting company will be reviewing the Griffith Recommendations to determine feasibility. What was missing from the meeting was any timeline or an idea of the process moving forward.

The Care Group have requested the following for clarification;

    1. Request detail around the brief, including inputs, and deliverables given to the consultants;
    2. Request timeline for the delivery of these deliverables;
    3. Request meeting with consultants in order to provide relevant info and some inputs.
    1. Request detail around duration for this exercise and who will be doing it;
    2. Request timeline for this analysis;
    3. Once completed timeline and path through GCCC.
    1. On the assumption the multi criteria analysis confirms the recommendations of the Griffith Report, being phoslock with sand capping, when can we expect the implementation.

Council have responded and advised they will communicate with Tony Webber from Alluvium Consulting next week to arrange a meeting with him and the Care Group Rep to understand issues from a resident perspective. The above points will also be clarified at the meeting.

The Care Group will update the public with a community meeting shortly after.


Merrimac High School Sailing Program at Risk Over Possible Storage Shed Removal

Council are considering removal of the sailing boat storage shed citing erosion issues.

Merrimac High have been using this shed for the best part of 30 years for boat storage to provide sailing a part of their physical education program and are keen to continue.

It would be a pity to have this unique opportunity for students to be introduced to sailing denied due to erosion issues that can be easily resolved. As with other areas around the lake, some overdue maintenance in this neglected area could resolve these issues.

The care group have raised concern over the possible removal and indicated that Council should be supporting and improving facilities providing this service-not removing and request they take into consideration the benefits of continuing this service to the local community. Clearly the youth of today needs to be given every opportunity to get away from their devices and out in the real world.



Brief Update on Council Meeting

The Care Group met with Griffith and Council to discuss the Stage 3 Griffith Report recommendations on the reduction of Algal Blooms.

Council have advised they have enlisted Alluvium Consultants to review the Griffith report and perform the feasibility study.

The care group raised concern that the Griffith report, a report with the scope to reduce the frequency and duration of algal blooms did not include investigation into key lake health issues including plant loss and stratification.

The Griffith specialist Michelle Burford confirmed that plant loss was not one of the briefs for investigation.

It is important that all aspects are included in the feasibility study especially key lake health issues. The Care Group will be seeking clarification from Council to confirm this is correct.

It is great news that well respected consultants are performing the feasibility study and is important that all possible options are investigated including aeration, one-way valve etc are considered.

The care group have requested a meeting with the consultants to ensure they are aware of key observations and issues from a resident perspective.

Council were unable to provide any idea of completion but indicated a possible meeting Mid Next year? This is not consistent with previous correspondence that advised;

Once Griffith University’s experiments and report are completed in June 2020, officers will then commence the multi criteria analysis process on recommendations from the report to determine the feasibility, environmental & social considerations and associated costs of potential options. This will likely take a number of weeks to complete.

The care group will be seeking clarification on the expected completion of review and have requested a timeline on when new can finally expect some action.

It is expected to call another community meeting in a few weeks to discuss the meeting after clarification of the above.



Council Meeting Restrictions Set to Silence Community Feedback

The community meeting was a great success today and would like to thank all who attended. The community feed back echoed the Care Groups many concerns that need to be discussed at the upcoming LHMSG meeting with Council.

Unfortunately key attendees at the LHMSG meeting including the head engineer and both Griffith Uni specialists will not be physically attending but online.

Despite many requests  for connectivity to display documents, graphs etc to all attendees as a necessary part of discussions, this request has been refused.

Clearly the inability to display information along with severely restricted time frames will hamper the ability of the Care Group Rep to convey and represent the community and is unacceptable.

The points open for discussion are included in the Reply To Clr Youngs Letter.

If you would like your voice to be heard could you please raise your concern directly with the decision makers below;

Council Contacts;


Phone: 1300465326

Councillor Pauline Young
City of Gold Coast
T: 07 5581 6382
PO Box 5042 Gold Coast Mail Centre Qld 9729